Alabama has officially adopted a new congressional map that aims to empower Black voters in the state and give them a greater say in their political representation.
Electing Preferred Candidates
This change provides Black voters with the opportunity to elect their preferred candidates in at least two out of seven congressional districts in the upcoming 2024 elections.
The shift in political representation may also have significant implications for the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The Previous Map
Under the previous congressional map, Black voters, who constitute about a quarter of Alabama’s population, had a majority in only one of the state’s seven congressional districts.
A New Map
The new map, selected by a three-judge panel, seeks to rectify this imbalance. It maintains a majority of Black voters in one district and creates a second district where Black voters make up 48.7% of the population.
This percentage is deemed sufficient to allow Black voters in the district to have a say in electing their preferred candidate.
The Importance of Representation
The judges’ decision is grounded in the principle of fair representation, as outlined in the Voting Rights Act.
In this Act, they explain the need for increasing Black voters’ power in the state while closely adhering to Alabama’s legislature’s 2023 plan.
The Act stated, “Under the Voting Rights Act and binding precedent, the appropriate remedy for racially discriminatory vote dilution is… a congressional districting plan that includes either an additional majority-Black district or an additional district in which Black voters otherwise have an opportunity to elect a representative of their choice.”
Alabama’s voting patterns are characterized by racial polarization, with Black voters predominantly supporting Democrats and white voters leaning toward Republicans.
Favoring the Democratic Party
Therefore, any district allowing Black voters to choose their preferred candidates is likely to favor the Democratic party. An important factor to consider when Republicans currently hold a narrow 221-212 advantage in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Alabama’s Secretary of State, Wes Allen, a Republican, acknowledged the court’s ruling and stated that the state would comply with the new map for the 2024 election cycle.
Allen said Alabama will “facilitate the 2024 election cycle in accordance with the map the federal court has forced upon Alabama and ordered us to use.”
This comes after a series of legal battles in which Alabama Republicans resisted the creation of an additional opportunity district for Black voters.
Their previous attempts were deemed insufficient, leading to the court’s intervention.
Victory for Voting Rights
The case is considered a significant victory for Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting practices.
Conservatives have often worked against this law by trying to make it more difficult to prove racial discrimination toward voters.
A Conservative Majority
The fact that this congressional map change was passed when there is a conservative majority in the US Supreme Court, shows that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act has not been forgotten yet.
However, similar legal battles are ongoing in other states, including Louisiana and Georgia, which could result in the creation of additional opportunity districts for Black voters and potentially increase Democratic power in these states.
Eric Holder’s Perspective
Former Attorney General Eric Holder, whose non-profit supported some of the plaintiffs in this case, hailed the decision as a triumph for justice.
Justice for the State
Holder said, “In spite of the shameful intransigence of Alabama Republicans, justice has finally prevailed in the state. With this new, fairer map, and for the first time ever, Black voters in Alabama could have two members of Congress representing their interests at the same time. This historic development will strengthen voting rights and ensure equal representation for so many Americans.”
No Longer Tolerated
Holder also issued a warning to other states facing Section 2 cases. He said, “Other states with pending section 2 cases should view this map, and this process, as both an example of basic fairness and a warning that denying equal representation to Black voters, violating the Voting Rights Act, and defying federal court orders is a direct tie to an odious past and will no longer be tolerated.”
Trump’s Judge Issues an Order that Might Finally Take Him Down
Federal Judge Aileen Cannon recently issued an order clarifying the rules for handling classified information in former President Donald Trump’s ongoing legal battle about government documents found in his Mar-a-Lago estate, and some see it as a clear indication that Trump will be losing this case. Trump’s Judge Issues an Order that Might Finally Take Him Down
“I’ll Just Follow My Orders” – Biden Rambles Through Another Speech That Leaves People Asking – Who’s Pulling the President’s Strings?’
President Joe Biden’s recent press conference in Vietnam on September 11th sparked concerns and controversy as he made comments that left many questioning his mental and decision-making abilities. Here’s the full story. “I’ll Just Follow My Orders” – Biden Rambles Through Another Speech That Leaves People Asking – Who’s Pulling the President’s Strings?’
Are Vaccine and Mask Mandates Returning? According to Biden, Very Likely
President Joe Biden asked Congress for more money to develop a new COVID-19 vaccine, and he may require everyone to get it. Here’s the full story. Are Vaccine and Mask Mandates Returning? According to Biden, Very Likely
Teachers Call Out DeSantis as a “Global Embarrassment” After New ‘Anti-Gay Law’ Means Colleges Were Forced to Drop Psychology
In a recent development, the state of Florida has found itself embroiled in a contentious debate over the curriculum of its Advanced Placement (AP) psychology course. Teachers Call Out DeSantis as a “Global Embarrassment” After New ‘Anti-Gay Law’ Means Colleges Were Forced to Drop Psychology
“Constitutionally Ineligible” – Trump’s House of Cards on the Verge of Collapse as Supreme Court Could Finally Take Him Down
Legal experts are debating the relevance of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which disqualifies people involved in insurrection from holding office. Some believe it could mean the disqualification of former President Trump from running for office. “Constitutionally Ineligible” – Trump’s House of Cards on the Verge of Collapse as Supreme Court Could Finally Take Him Down
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Katherine Welles. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.