Doctors Sue California Over Controversial Implicit Bias Training Requirement

California doctors are suing over mandatory implicit bias training, claiming it wrongly asserts that “white individuals are naturally racist.”

Challenging California’s Mandatory Implicit Bias Training

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Cast Of Thousands

A group of California doctors, including the anti-discrimination organization Do No Harm, has filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s mandatory implicit bias training for physicians, arguing that the training promotes the notion that “white individuals are naturally racist.”

Suing Over Implicit Bias Training 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Jirapong Manustron

The lawsuit pertains to AB 241, a legislation passed by California lawmakers in 2019, which mandates that all continuing medical education (CME) courses include implicit bias training. 

Take This Training or Lose Your License

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Drazen Zigic

Given that physicians are required to complete 50 CME hours annually to maintain their medical licenses, the law effectively compels practitioners to undergo this training or risk losing their professional livelihoods. 

Taking Valuable Time Away

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Axel Alvarez

Critics assert that this requirement replaces valuable course time with potentially irrelevant or counterproductive content.

The Doctor Leading the Charge

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi

The case, known as Azadeh Khatibi, et al. v. Kristina Lawson, et. al, was initiated by the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) on behalf of Dr. Azadeh Khatibi, an ophthalmology specialist and CME instructor who immigrated to the U.S. from Iran at a young age. 

She Says It’s Irrelevant to Her Field

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi

Dr. Khatibi’s objection lies in being compelled to integrate discussions of implicit bias into her courses when such topics hold no relevance to her field. 

Other Subjects Might Be Better

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Roman Samborskyi

She also believes other subjects could more effectively address disparities in treatment outcomes.

The Evidence Doesn’t Hold Up

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Amnaj Khetsamtip

In their legal filing, the PLF underscored the argumentative nature of evidence surrounding the existence of implicit bias.  

Improperly Conducted Training Can Lead to Resentment 

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Dean Drobot

They also highlighted that improperly conducted implicit bias training can often lead to increased resentment and anger rather than achieving its intended goals.

She’s Not Alone in Her Fight

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Jacob Lund

Joining Dr. Khatibi in the PLF lawsuit is Dr. Marilyn Singleton and Do No Harm. Dr. Singleton, a visiting fellow at Do No Harm, a California anesthesiologist, and a CME instructor. 

‘Do No Harm’: “Promotes the Inaccurate Belief That White Individuals Are Naturally Racist”

Image Credit: Shutterstock / fizkes

Dr. Singleton emphasized, “The implicit bias requirement promotes the inaccurate belief that white individuals are naturally racist.

This message can be detrimental to medical professionals and their patients as it creates an atmosphere of suspicion and animosity, which goes against the fundamental principle of doing no harm.”

The Medical Board Had No Comment

Image Credit: Shutterstock / Camilo Torres

The Medical Board of California refrained from commenting on the matter “due to pending litigation.”

The post Doctors Sue California Over Controversial Implicit Bias Training Requirement first appeared on Back Edge News.

Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Olena Yakobchuk. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.

+ posts

Leave a Comment